Re: Patch: Some more state codes

From: Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda(at)truviso(dot)com>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: "Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson" <johann(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch: Some more state codes
Date: 2011-09-09 16:17:49
Message-ID: CAH_hXRYK9G8=dwfadVt9AmDfhi_rjawgmbY4E9+ttTQ2wrNh+w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

> I guess I was not expecting users trying to write portable JDBC code to
> write code that referred to PG specific classes. Do other people do this?

Well, not if you're striving for portable code, but for what it's
worth, there are frequently good reasons to ignore portability
completely and just use the JDBC driver as a way to access PostgreSQL
from Java. In that case, having access to as many PostgreSQL-specific
features / options / error states as possible can be very handy.

---
Maciek Sakrejda | System Architect | Truviso

1065 E. Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 215
Foster City, CA 94404
(650) 242-3500 Main
www.truviso.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bryan Montgomery 2011-09-09 17:44:53 Re: Patch: Some more state codes
Previous Message dmp 2011-09-09 14:50:42 Re: Patch: Some more state codes