Re: Release versioning inconsistency

2012/6/20 Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>> (I do believe that using the v9.2.0beta marker is
>>> *better*, because then it sorts properly. But likely not enough much
>>> better to be inconsistent with previous versions)
>>
>> Good point. Maybe that's a reason to change the versioning scheme and
>> stick with "9.2.0betaX" everywhere. Including calling the final
>> release "9.2.0" instead of simply "9.2"?
>
> That might actually be a good idea. We can't really change the way we
> named the betas, but it's not too late to consider naming the actual
> release as 9.2.0...

May be a symlink could be created just do fit the same pattern that other
versions do and keeps the actual links (for beta) working.

I'm using the same pattern in `pgvm` [1] and it is failing to fetch
beta versions :(

[1] https://github.com/guedes/pgvm/blob/master/include/sites

regards
--
Dickson S. Guedes
mail/xmpp: guedes(at)guedesoft(dot)net - skype: guediz
http://guedesoft.net - http://www.postgresql.org.br