From: | "Dickson S(dot) Guedes" <listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Should we keep using trac? |
Date: | 2012-06-17 15:15:47 |
Message-ID: | CAHHcreoikg1cEJy01HVQmFDsrX5Az8pppvsXY9LmEYrGsDGFLQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
2012/6/17 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>:
> Quick question: is trac the right tool?
Which problems we are trying to solve using trac? Are they solved or minimized?
> Maybe trac is not the right tool, and we should use something else?
Maybe are we using it the right way?
I like trac and redmine, the former to projects that are simple, with
simple workflow, the second to more complex projects, with
sub-project, ticket dependencies and, IMHO, a better notion of
"progress" for tickets and milestones.
Which goals we want to achieve?
regards
--
Dickson S. Guedes
mail/xmpp: guedes(at)guedesoft(dot)net - skype: guediz
http://guedesoft.net - http://www.postgresql.org.br
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashesh Vashi | 2012-06-18 06:46:25 | Re: PoC: Little improvements to EditGrid - Enum ComboBox |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2012-06-17 14:46:22 | Should we keep using trac? |