Re: simple wording fix

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: darko(dot)prelec(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: simple wording fix
Date: 2016-12-05 11:49:17
Message-ID: CAHGQGwHkdha+d3k1S060RQTOPBuPmL4jVNgmL-kdyht=YGp+FA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:43 PM, <darko(dot)prelec(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/parallel-plans.html
> Description:
>
> Hi!
>
> In the first paragraph of the second part of the third sentence, this:
>
> &quot;it must constructed so that each process which executes the plan&quot;
>
> should be:
>
> &quot;it must be constructed so that each process which executes the plan&quot;.
>
> That is, the &quot;be&quot; is missing.

Fixed. Thanks for the report!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message finzelj 2016-12-05 18:14:30 pg_logical_slot_get_changes needs clarification
Previous Message Ian Barwick 2016-12-05 00:55:19 Re: monitoring.sgml - clarify length of query text displayed in pg_stat_statements