Re: Cascade replication

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Cascade replication
Date: 2011-07-11 01:26:44
Message-ID: CAHGQGwHdC4j=OgCXs3U-wtNT_3qMD54HTTh8wLEM3s4Z+1=2JA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Fujii,
>
>> In the current scheme we restart archiving from the last restartpoint,
>> which exists only on the archive. This new patch improves upon this by
>> keeping the most recent files locally, so we are less expose in the
>> case of archive unavailability. So this patch already improves things
>> and we don't need any more than that. No extra code please, IMHO.
>
> Do you think you'll submit a new version of the patch this commitfest?

Yes. I'm now updating the patch according to Simon's comments.
I will submit it today.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2011-07-11 01:34:27 Re: Enhanced psql in core?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-07-11 01:21:19 Re: per-column generic option