Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out)

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out)
Date: 2014-06-04 14:10:48
Message-ID: CAHGQGwHJdY7U-aHX4fgdosHn76ZyCMAaR+WK24EHSiS5PRai1A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following (commit 2985e16) has not been backpatched, I guess.
>
> ANALYZE hs1;
> -ERROR: cannot execute VACUUM during recovery
> +ERROR: cannot execute ANALYZE during recovery
>
> Attached is a patch for this.

Why did you cut off the following part? ISTM that also needs to be back-patched.
So we should just do "git cherry-pick 2985e16" on 9.3.

-begin transaction isolation level serializable;
+begin transaction isolation level repeatable read;

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-06-04 14:14:42 Re: Allowing join removals for more join types
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-06-04 14:03:09 pg_control is missing a field for LOBLKSIZE