Re: Archive recovery won't be completed on some situation.

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Archive recovery won't be completed on some situation.
Date: 2014-03-24 11:26:29
Message-ID: CAHGQGwG3nrhpG3ibRUnnOWBcH-_0N647_Da6841j3psEARTKCw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> At Wed, 19 Mar 2014 19:34:10 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote
>> > Agreed. Attached patches do that and I could "recover" the
>> > database state with following steps,
>>
>> Adding new option looks like new feature rather than bug fix.
>> I'm afraid that the backpatch of such a change to 9.3 or before
>> is not acceptable.
>
> Me too. But on the other hand it simplly is a relief for the
> consequence of the behavior of server (altough it was ill
> operation:), and especially it is needed for at least 9.1 which
> seems cannot be saved without it. Plus it has utterly no impact
> on servers' behavior of any corresponding versions. So I hope it
> is accepted.

Even in 9.1, we can think that problematic situation as database corruption
and restart the server from the backup which was successfully taken before.
No?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2014-03-24 11:59:01 Re: Standby server won't start
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2014-03-24 11:22:52 Re: Review: plpgsql.extra_warnings, plpgsql.extra_errors