From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby |
Date: | 2011-11-04 04:20:31 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwFcQbHjcNcXZPGS8edLw8yb69VTE5Vj8U3Y0y+3F52=cQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> On 10/25/11 5:03 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> If we want something to go in early, that could be as simple as a
>> version of pg_basebackup that runs against the slave but only if
>> full_page_writes=on on the master. If it's not, it throws an error.
>> Then we can improve upon that by adding handling of fpw=off, first by
>> infrastructure, then by tool.
>
> Just to be clear, the idea is to require full_page_writes to do backup
> from the standby in 9.2, but to remove the requirement later?
Yes unless I'm missing something. Not sure if we can remove that in 9.2, though.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-11-04 05:16:29 | Re: Further plans to refactor xlog.c |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-11-04 02:36:48 | Re: DeArchiver process |