Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result
Date: 2012-03-23 10:13:58
Message-ID: CAHGQGwFKw6NBcXV4sxcCGdcpTcxz=eGj_NKeN1vW75ftu_Kagw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Might it be a good idea to put it on it's own row instead of changing
> the format of an existing row, in order not to break scripts and
> programs that are parsing the previous output?

Good idea! What row name should we use for the WAL file containing
REDO record? "Latest checkpoint's REDO file"?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-03-23 12:38:44 Re: checkpoint patches
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2012-03-23 09:54:17 Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result