Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result
Date: 2012-03-28 01:08:58
Message-ID: CAHGQGwF=xFphJs6t_5WxjU+o1sFnKWx8EqsvO7vzVumkeVcWWg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Fujii Masao's message of mar mar 27 06:40:34 -0300 2012:
>
>> Anyway, should I add this patch into the next CF? Or is anyone planning
>> to commit the patch for 9.2?
>
> I think the correct thing to do here is add to next CF, and if some
> committer has enough interest in getting it quickly it can be grabbed
> from there and committed into 9.2.

Yep! I've added it to next CF.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shigeru HANADA 2012-03-28 01:41:01 Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-03-28 00:51:31 Re: Patch: add timing of buffer I/O requests