Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs

From: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs
Date: 2019-08-30 08:27:00
Message-ID: CAGz5QCJ1OP0N2NwJSfiUKcCteaO6eH9-PwaeOSUBKy6Cz5rKXQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Thomas,

I was doing some testing for the scenario where the undo written by a
transaction overflows to multiple undo logs. For that I've modified
the following macro:
#define UndoLogMaxSize (1024 * 1024) /* 1MB undo log size */
(I should have used the provided pg_force_switch_undo though..)

I'm getting the following assert failure while performing the recovery
with the same.
"TRAP: FailedAssertion("slot->meta.status == UNDO_LOG_STATUS_FULL",
File: "undolog.c", Line: 997)"

I found that we don't emit an WAL record when we update the
slot->meta.status as UNDO_LOG_STATUS_FULL. If we don't that, after
crash recovery, some new transaction may use that undo log which is
wrong, IMHO. Am I missing something?

--
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2019-08-30 09:40:16 Re: no mailing list hits in google
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2019-08-30 08:06:11 Re: refactoring - share str2*int64 functions