From: | Diego Augusto Molina <diegoaugustomolina(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: is max connections in a database table somewhere |
Date: | 2011-08-11 17:14:25 |
Message-ID: | CAGOxLdHwJkcqLg8ZCT_qYAMi2zPVEBc_8+qtkF659rXsP6Bjzg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2011/8/10, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> On 08/10/2011 02:46 PM, Geoffrey Myers wrote:
>> Is the max connections value in a system table somewhere?
Yes, it is in the table "pg_catalog.pg_database". The column is named
"datconnlimit" and is of type "int4". See this:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/catalog-pg-database.html.
But this would be the appropiate way of getting the value:
> SELECT CAST(current_setting('max_connections') AS integer);
You would rather use that form instead of messing up with the catalogs.
--
Diego Augusto Molina
diegoaugustomolina(at)gmail(dot)com
ES: Por favor, evite adjuntar documentos de Microsoft Office. Serán
desestimados.
EN: Please, avoid attaching Microsoft Office documents. They shall be discarded.
LINK: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Louis-David Mitterrand | 2011-08-11 17:27:42 | FK violation on (emtpy) parent table |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2011-08-11 16:26:18 | Final 48 for PgWest CFP |