Re: : PostgreSQL Index behavior

From: Venkat Balaji <venkat(dot)balaji(at)verse(dot)in>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: : PostgreSQL Index behavior
Date: 2012-09-13 09:22:39
Message-ID: CAFrxt0hCqyoLgLW2LP869ViXe0eLGHzPAyRNoWmLWwDTi-pdqg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Venkat Balaji <venkat(dot)balaji(at)verse(dot)in>
> wrote:
>
> > We are using PostgreSQL-9.0.1.
>
> You are missing almost 2 years of updates, bug fixes, and security fixes.
>

Thank you Scott, We are planning to upgrade to the latest version (9.2) in
the near future.

Regards,
VB

--

DISCLAIMER:

Please note that this message and any attachments may contain confidential
and proprietary material and information and are intended only for the use
of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any review, use, disclosure, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately
notify the sender and delete this e-mail , whether electronic or printed.
Please also note that any views, opinions, conclusions or commitments
expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and do not
necessarily reflect the views of *Ver sé Innovation Pvt Ltd*.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2012-09-13 09:39:52 Re: : PostgreSQL Index behavior
Previous Message Bill Martin 2012-09-13 09:05:26 Re: Planner selects different execution plans depending on limit