Re: WARNING: concurrent insert in progress within table "resource"

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WARNING: concurrent insert in progress within table "resource"
Date: 2012-03-07 21:32:42
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDgHLy9gHEcJDLe13858xjr+T2aBO765uJJVjekJOndtg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2012/3/7 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> yes
>>
>> 2012/2/27 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> I tested creating some larger indexes
>>>>
>>>> There was a warning:
>>>>
>>>> postgres=# CREATE INDEX idx_resource_name ON resource (name, tid);
>>>> WARNING:  concurrent insert in progress within table "resource"
>>>>
>>>> I am sure so there was only one active session - so this warning is strange.
>>>>
>>
>> sure
>>
>> I tried generate data from
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2012-02/msg00210.php
>> example
>>
>> I used pg from yesterday GIT repository
>>
>> and my configuration was
>>
>> shared buffers 500MB
>> maintenance_work_mem 200MB
>> wal_buffers 64MB
>> checkpoint_segments 32
>
> Is this repeatable?
>

I didn't repeated this test, but I'll check it tomorrow.

Pavel

> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-03-07 21:43:10 Re: Fix PL/Python metadata when there is no result
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2012-03-07 21:28:42 Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?