Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements

2013/2/23 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> 2013/2/23 Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>:
>>> Why is that? lookup_function_oid() only collects the oid to pass to
>>> get_create_function_cmd(), why not just issue one query to the backend?
>>> And use PSQLexec() to boot and get --echo-hidden, etc, for free? And
>>> eliminate the one-off error handling for just this case?
>
>> yes, we can do it. There is only one issue
>
>> routines for parsing function signature in regproc and regprocedure
>> should be updated - and I would to get some agreement than I start to
>> do modify core.
>
> Uh ... you seem to be asking for a blank check to modify regprocedure,
> which is unlikely to be forthcoming. Why do you think these things need
> to be changed, and to what?

If I understand well to request to remove "minimal_error_message" we
need to have fault tolerant regprocedure.

I am looking on this code now, and it is not easy as I though - there
are two possible errors: not found or found more - so returning
InvalidOid is not enough - and then some "new lookup" function is not
simple or is ugly - and I am not sure, so cost is less than benefit.
in this case.

Regards

Pavel

>
> regards, tom lane