Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql
Date: 2015-09-18 12:25:19
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDTAA54tCWWSmmSjCKJkOifeRLjqMQcTsReHgxULpYOiA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2015-09-18 13:59 GMT+02:00 Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>:

> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
> > my comments:
> >
> > 1. I don't understand why you are use two methods for sorting columns
> > (qsort, and query with ORDER BY)
>
> qsort (with strcmp as the comparator) is only used to determine the
> set of distinct values for the vertical and horizontal headers.
> In fact this is just to allow the use of bsearch() when doing that
> instead of a slower sequential search.
>
> Once the values for the horizontal headers are known, they
> are passed to the server for sorting with server-side semantics
> according to their type. The order will differ from qsort/strcmp
> found as the comparison semantics are different.
>
> The values for the vertical header are not sorted server-side
> because we keep the order of the query for displaying
> top to bottom.
> In the typical use case , it will have ORDER BY 1[,2] possibly
> with one/two DESC qualifiers.
>

ok

>
> > 2. Data column are not well aligned - numbers are aligned as text
>
> Yes. I'll look shortly into fixing that.
>
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Daniel Vérité
> PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org
> Twitter: @DanielVerite
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2015-09-18 12:58:06 Re: WIP: Rework access method interface
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2015-09-18 12:01:33 Re: Parallel Seq Scan