Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message
Date: 2015-08-29 23:22:37
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDMGB+3tVyX5cbk=r1Ej383EOPfKHhheVVRd7jFbWZ7dQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

I am starting to work review of this patch

2015-07-13 9:54 GMT+02:00 dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> Hi All,
>
> Greetings for the day.
>
> Would like to discuss on below feature here.
>
> Feature:
> Having an SQL function, to write messages to log destination.
>
> Justification:
> As of now, we don't have an SQL function to write custom/application
> messages to log destination. We have "RAISE" clause which is controlled by
> log_ parameters. If we have an SQL function which works irrespective of
> log settings, that would be a good for many log parsers. What i mean is, in
> DBA point of view, if we route all our native OS stats to log files in a
> proper format, then we can have our log reporting tools to give most
> effective reports. Also, Applications can log their own messages to
> postgres log files, which can be monitored by DBAs too.
>
> Implementation:
> Implemented a new function "pg_report_log" which takes one argument as
> text, and returns void. I took, "LOG" prefix for all the reporting
> messages.I wasn't sure to go with new prefix for this, since these are
> normal LOG messages. Let me know, if i am wrong here.
>
> Here is the attached patch.
>

This patch is not complex, but the implementation doesn't cover a "ereport"
well.

Although this functionality should be replaced by custom function in any PL
(now or near future), I am not against to have this function in core. There
are lot of companies with strong resistance against stored procedures - and
sometimes this functionality can help with SQL debugging.

Issues:

1. Support only MESSAGE field in exception - I am expecting to support all
fields: HINT, DETAIL, ...
2. Missing regress tests
3. the parsing ereport level should be public function shared with PLpgSQL
and other PL
4. should be hidestmt mandatory parameter?
5. the function declaration is strange

postgres=# \sf pg_report_log (text, anyelement, boolean)
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION pg_catalog.pg_report_log(text, anyelement,
boolean)
RETURNS void
LANGUAGE sql
STABLE STRICT COST 1
AS $function$SELECT pg_report_log($1::pg_catalog.text, $2::pg_catalog.text,
$3::boolean)$function$

Why polymorphic? It is useless on any modern release

postgres=# \sf pg_report_log (text, text, boolean)
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION pg_catalog.pg_report_log(text, text, boolean)
RETURNS void
LANGUAGE internal
IMMUTABLE STRICT
AS $function$pg_report_log$function$

Why stable, why immutable? This function should be volatile.

6. using elog level enum as errcode is wrong idea - errcodes are defined in
table http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/errcodes-appendix.html

Regards

Pavel

>
> Regards,
> Dinesh
> manojadinesh.blogspot.com
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2015-08-29 23:38:37 Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2015-08-29 22:52:51 Re: buffer README is out of date