| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: count_nulls(VARIADIC "any") |
| Date: | 2016-02-05 04:08:38 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDEZ=gW0gVi2pmZwtbo_Ld4QOjCRKRr0ZMuRjHD9wHy2A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dne 5. 2. 2016 1:33 napsal uživatel "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > [ num_nulls_v6.patch ]
>
> I started looking through this. It seems generally okay, but I'm not
> very pleased with the function name "num_notnulls". I think it would
> be better as "num_nonnulls", as I see Oleksandr suggested already.
I have no problem with it.
Regards
Pavel
>
> regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-02-05 04:30:45 | Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-02-05 04:06:35 | Re: count_nulls(VARIADIC "any") |