From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
Date: | 2016-09-28 14:06:59 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCxVuqD+04BPyjn22k5H-fQDDyUNV0hWUtKoDnWrr2L_A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2016-09-28 16:03 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
> wrote:
> >> I feel like we're getting wrapped around the axle as it regards who is
> >> perceived to be voting for what.
>
> > Thanks Stephen Frost for listing down all the concerns from the people
> > on the different approaches.
>
> I'm not sure if we've arrived at a consensus or not, but here's my
> current thinking: it's very early in the v10 cycle, so we have time
> to experiment. I propose to push my current patch (ie, move PL function
> source code to \df+ footers), and we can use it in HEAD for awhile
> and see what we think. We can alway improve or revert it later.
>
I had some objection to format of source code - it should be full source
code, not just header and body.
Regards
Pavel
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lou Picciano | 2016-09-28 14:16:16 | Re: Python3.4 detection on 9.6 configuration |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-09-28 14:03:05 | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |