Re: Showing parallel status in \df+

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Date: 2016-09-28 14:06:59
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCxVuqD+04BPyjn22k5H-fQDDyUNV0hWUtKoDnWrr2L_A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2016-09-28 16:03 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:

> Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
> wrote:
> >> I feel like we're getting wrapped around the axle as it regards who is
> >> perceived to be voting for what.
>
> > Thanks Stephen Frost for listing down all the concerns from the people
> > on the different approaches.
>
> I'm not sure if we've arrived at a consensus or not, but here's my
> current thinking: it's very early in the v10 cycle, so we have time
> to experiment. I propose to push my current patch (ie, move PL function
> source code to \df+ footers), and we can use it in HEAD for awhile
> and see what we think. We can alway improve or revert it later.
>

I had some objection to format of source code - it should be full source
code, not just header and body.

Regards

Pavel

>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lou Picciano 2016-09-28 14:16:16 Re: Python3.4 detection on 9.6 configuration
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-09-28 14:03:05 Re: Showing parallel status in \df+