Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Date: 2012-03-02 08:30:01
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCuUPff9_4Ysa_-20n-3Sa31f8Ld0x-UXxkTN6ZQA7JqQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2012/3/2 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
> I've cleaned up the backend code a bit -- see attached.  More yet to go
> through; I'm mainly sending it out for you (and everyone, really) to
> give your opinion on my changes so far.
>
> (I split out the plpgsql checker for the time being into a separate
> branch; I'll get on it after I get this part committed.)

it looks well

Regards

Pavel Stěhule

>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-03-02 08:46:45 Re: COPY with hints, rebirth
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2012-03-02 08:29:26 Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement