| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: anyone tried to use hoard allocator? |
| Date: | 2012-03-26 11:09:34 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCmTguQ+RQ7GLC8RtxZF9s9s1RW=LE05AxxZbtjwaeANA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
2012/3/26 Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>:
> Hi all,
>
> today I've noticed this link on HN: http://plasma.cs.umass.edu/emery/hoard
>
> Seems like an interesting option for systems with a lot of CPUs that are
> doing a lot of alloc operations. Right now I don't have a suitable system
> to test it - anyone tried to benchmark it?
It has sense for pg? It is not a multithread application.
Pavel
>
>
> Tomas
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Atkins | 2012-03-26 16:00:18 | Re: anyone tried to use hoard allocator? |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2012-03-26 09:50:00 | anyone tried to use hoard allocator? |