Re: anyone tried to use hoard allocator?

From: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: anyone tried to use hoard allocator?
Date: 2012-03-26 16:00:18
Message-ID: 340D90B6-9FA3-4EBA-930A-DECA0CF916CB@blighty.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


On Mar 26, 2012, at 2:50 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> today I've noticed this link on HN: http://plasma.cs.umass.edu/emery/hoard
>
> Seems like an interesting option for systems with a lot of CPUs that are
> doing a lot of alloc operations. Right now I don't have a suitable system
> to test it - anyone tried to benchmark it?

It's just another allocator - not a bad one, but it's been around for years. It's
mostly aimed at reducing contention in multi-threaded applications, so
it's not terribly applicable to strictly single-threaded postgresql.

It's licensing is pretty much incompatible with postgresql too.

Cheers,
Steve

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Berkus 2012-03-27 19:58:22 Re: Determining working set size
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2012-03-26 11:09:34 Re: anyone tried to use hoard allocator?