| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: proof concept - access to session variables on client side |
| Date: | 2012-06-27 11:37:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRByFwxN3rhWf4tr3TS=MfPPUuFkuU-M7=x6D0UtxY0r-Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2012/6/27 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> Another thing I don't care for is the unannounced protocol extension.
>
>> yes, it needs protocol extension and increasing version too. But I
>> don't afraid about dissynchronisation - server doesn't send 'v'
>> message when client doesn't support it.
>
> And you would know that how, exactly?
minor version of protocol can be used
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-12/msg00025.php
I don't know if this topic is done, I only remember this thread
Regards
Pavel Stehule
>
> regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-06-27 11:41:55 | Re: Posix Shared Mem patch |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-27 11:34:48 | Re: Posix Shared Mem patch |