From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: custom function for converting human readable sizes to bytes |
Date: | 2015-12-22 05:33:54 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAe-CDgb2Sz6zc1=DRMnjqDx-+2dmC0T90KYqHeKw5wuw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2015-12-22 6:22 GMT+01:00 Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >> new update:
> >>
> >> 1. unit searching is case insensitive
> >>
> >> 2. initial support for binary byte prefixes - KiB, MiB, .. (IEC
> standard),
> >> change behave for SI units
> >>
> >> Second point is much more complex then it is looking - if pg_size_bytes
> >> should be consistent with pg_size_pretty.
> >>
> >> The current pg_size_pretty and transformations in guc.c are based on
> JEDEC
> >> standard. Using this standard for GUC has sense - using it for object
> sizes
> >> is probably unhappy.
> >>
> >> I tried to fix (and enhance) pg_size_pretty - now reports correct
> units, and
> >> via second parameter it allows to specify base: 2 (binary, IEC -
> default)
> >> or 10 (SI).
> >
> > -1 from me. I don't think we should muck with the way pg_size_pretty
> works.
>
> Yeah.
>
> + static const unit_multiplier unit_multiplier_table[] =
> + {
> + {"B", 1L},
> + {"kiB", 1024L},
> + {"MiB", 1024L * 1024},
> + {"GiB", 1024L * 1024 * 1024},
> + {"TiB", 1024L * 1024 * 1024 * 1024},
> + {"PiB", 1024L * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024},
> This is rather close to memory_unit_conversion_table in guc.c. Would
> it be worth refactoring those unit tables into something more generic
> instead of duplicating them?
>
yes, it is possible with following impacts:
1. We need add PB to memory_unit_conversion_table in guc.c
2. This table holds multipliers in JEDEC standard - and introduce other
standards IEC, SI there isn't good idea.
Is it ok?
Regards
Pavel
> --
> Michael
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2015-12-22 05:54:15 | Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-12-22 05:22:56 | Re: custom function for converting human readable sizes to bytes |