inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logical replication launcher

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logical replication launcher
Date: 2017-10-27 08:06:29
Message-ID: CAFj8pRA0HYp2BHxZfy3fPio-cqKEq00ay0+BqeeLc1bb1ZXQNQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

Why buildin process has prefix bgworker?

1907 ? Ss 13:00 postgres: ides ides_immaj_prac
192.168.1.50(3524) idle
1941 ? Ss 0:05 postgres: ides ides_immaj_prac
192.168.1.50(3527) idle
3706 ? Ss 0:00 postgres: ides ides_immaj_prac
192.168.1.50(4012) idle
11924 pts/0 S+ 0:00 grep postgres
18710 ? Ss 0:01 postgres: logger
process
18712 ? Ss 0:06 postgres: checkpointer
process
18713 ? Ss 0:02 postgres: writer
process
18714 ? Ss 0:05 postgres: wal writer
process
18715 ? Ss 0:04 postgres: autovacuum launcher
process
18716 ? Ss 0:39 postgres: stats collector
process
18717 ? Ss 0:00 postgres: bgworker: logical replication
launcher
32202 ? Ss 0:00 postgres: ides postgres 192.168.1.50(3109)
idle
32226 ? Ss 0:00 postgres: ides ides_immaj_prac
192.168.1.50(3114) idle
32274 ? Ss 0:00 postgres: ides ides_jmmaj_akt 192.168.1.50(3124)
idle

regards

Pavel

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2017-10-27 08:55:05 MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Previous Message Rajkumar Raghuwanshi 2017-10-27 08:05:39 Re: path toward faster partition pruning