Re: Heavy contgnous load

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: kzsolt <kzsoltkzsolt(at)freemail(dot)hu>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Heavy contgnous load
Date: 2011-11-13 08:57:31
Message-ID: CAFj8pRA=871vLwT+4DWaMKbqVK60JWqUjFD2eu23dDe+ypeJsw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hello

2011/11/9 kzsolt <kzsoltkzsolt(at)freemail(dot)hu>:
> I try to found out more information. Looks like the COUNT(*) is not the
> strongest part of pgr therfore I do a worakround. After this I have the
> folwing result:
>
> Below the 1Mrec the row insert time is ~23msec. Above the 7Mrec the insert
> time is ~180msec.
>

* use a copy statement
* use a explicit transaction
* if you can disable triggers (and RI)
* if you cannot and use a RI, unsures a indexes on PK and FK

Regards

Pavel Stehule

> I belive I use the fastest index type (default).
>
> So any idea to make postgres faster at higher number of records?
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Heavy-contgnous-load-tp4913425p4978893.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-11-13 16:17:22 Re: Trying to understand Stats/Query planner issue
Previous Message Gavin Flower 2011-11-12 09:28:45 Re: Subquery in a JOIN not getting restricted?