Re: pl/perl example in the doc no longer works in 9.1

From: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amit(dot)khandekar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pl/perl example in the doc no longer works in 9.1
Date: 2011-10-14 03:28:01
Message-ID: CAFaPBrQ-HLnS7VkmLXtV-ABXJnSSP1vs1CcPqcuAv6aQHyZdXA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 16:05, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Applied with some further hacking of my own to clean up memory leaks
> and grotty coding.

Thanks!

BTW after seeing it I agree passing in fcinfo (and the other fixes) to
plperl_sv_to_datum() is better.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2011-10-14 06:57:13 Re: Will Index-only-scan be in 9.2
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-10-14 01:35:06 Re: WALInsertLock tuning