From: | Ranjeet Dhumal <jeetu(dot)dhumal(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ERROR: volatile EquivalenceClass has no sortref |
Date: | 2012-11-22 05:38:53 |
Message-ID: | CAFNnw=1xRWG+3ZS8_861XgZ12bXX=vPz__BeDqz93_oW7ph55A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hi Tom ,
Sorry but i didn't understand that If this is a bug from postgres version
then how the same query will be worked if i recreated the tables and with
same version of postgres.
On 21 November 2012 19:53, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> Ranjeet Dhumal wrote:
> > records , am using 9.0.1 version of postgres.
>
> > This is quite possibly your problem: You're 9 bugfix releases behind
> > on a .0 release. You should be at 9.0.10 at least.
>
> Yes. I seem to recall fixing a bug with exactly this symptom.
> Please update first, then if the problem is still there you can work
> on producing a self-contained test case.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
--Regards
Ranjeet R. Dhumal
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2012-11-22 06:27:02 | Re: Prepared Statement Name Truncation |
Previous Message | Vlad | 2012-11-21 20:41:36 | Re: High SYS CPU - need advise |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shigeru Hanada | 2012-11-22 05:40:48 | Re: FDW for PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Karl O. Pinc | 2012-11-22 05:33:18 | Re: User control over psql error stream |