Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time?

On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us> wrote:

> > On 01/10/2016 08:07 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
>
> >> So, the purpose of a CoC is twofold:
> >>
> >> A) Define what "being excellent" means to this particular
> >> community.
> >> B) Provide a process for how to resolve things when "being
> >> excellent" doesn't happen.
> >>
> >> Without #1, nobody will want to do #2, as it's basically a
> >> job that can never be done correctly.
>
> > I agree with you completely. That is actually why I included the link to
> > the graphic in the last post. My point was, I have no intention of
> > having a CoC that is full of drivel. I would want a clear, concise,
> > no-B.S. CoC.
>
> > JD
>
> This may come as a big shock to many of you, but as a contributor
> I don't care if you are racist, sexist, transphobic or whatever as long as
> you
>
> 1) Are helpful when I ask a question
> 2) Stick to the topic
> 3) Don't get into petty etiquettes like "Please stop top posting"
> and if you really need to - A polite we prefer top posting would do
>
> 4) Are sensitive to people on other operating systems other than your
> preferred.
>

+1

>
>
> My other concern about CoCs is I fear someone is going to come and demand
> we change Master/Slave to Leader/Follower, because Master is a male term
> and Slave is insensitive to grand-children of slaves.
>

Some people don't understand all these issues with she/he, for example, we
in Russia are not really concern about this.

>
>
> Thanks,
> Regina
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>