Re: Query performs badly with materialize node

From: Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ingmar Brouns <swingi(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Query performs badly with materialize node
Date: 2011-09-23 10:41:02
Message-ID: CAF-3MvNBT8-Qe0ygs7LrtkXfDYvGvoc-d95_zwZkoeDAomxH4Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 23 September 2011 12:31, Ingmar Brouns <swingi(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> >
> > In short: if you want to get useful commentary on your problem, you
> > need to provide a more complete picture.
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> >
>
> I've posted the query plans now several times to this list, but they
> do not show up, almost as if being caught by a spam filter or
> something. I've wrote to pgsql-general-owner about this a few days ago
> but haven't received a reply. Am I missing something?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Ingmar
>

GMail says you may not be who you say you are, so there is something going
on with your mails that's suspicious to some systems.

--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
Cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2011-09-23 10:48:15 Re: Speed of lo_unlink vs. DELETE on BYTEA
Previous Message Alban Hertroys 2011-09-23 10:39:33 Re: looking for a faster way to do that