From: | Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: CoC V5 |
Date: | 2016-01-14 17:23:36 |
Message-ID: | CAEzk6feGKBTcmRMRxdS0bpg_ZUEOkQ_wVpKWJXsoS77f2Tb4GA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 14 January 2016 at 17:11, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Right but here is the rub. Being anti-gay marriage isn't an extreme opinion.
> It is a minority opinion for sure but it is certainly not extreme.
Well it is - it's an extremity in the range of potential view points.
> Another issue, consider the statement:
>
> "We do not need more women in the community"
>
> Some will say, "Well yeah, that's true."
>
> Others will say, "You are sexist, you violate the CoC"
>
> We have both of those in this community, and I would argue the "others" are
> actually the ones violating the CoC. They are personally disparaging someone
> for a perfectly valid opinion.
Well yes, to say "you are sexist" is violating the CoC, because it's a
personal attack. The correct thing to do is to state that the opinion
is a violation of the CoC, without making any judgement about the
person making that statement :)
Geoff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2016-01-14 17:23:49 | Re: WIP: CoC V5 |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-01-14 17:20:46 | Re: WIP: CoC V5 |