Minor "pre-bug" in gram.y for DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY IF_P EXISTS

From: Brendan Byrd <Perl(at)ResonatorSoft(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Minor "pre-bug" in gram.y for DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY IF_P EXISTS
Date: 2012-08-24 18:24:48
Message-ID: CAEp_DmT8GegykJgkUOpmzdb2cySfi3n-o-dw8LqwWxqWUoSa1Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/parser/gram.y;hb=master#l4940

The "missing_ok" property should be true. Just something I noticed
when browsing the code. It appears to be a new language feature, so
it probably hasn't been noticed by the general public yet.

--
Brendan Byrd <Perl(at)ResonatorSoft(dot)org>
Brendan Byrd <BBYRD(at)CPAN(dot)org>

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2012-08-24 19:40:57 Re: Loose Index Scans by Planner?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-08-24 17:13:45 Re: default_isolation_level='serializable' crashes on Windows