| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Solaris testers wanted for strxfrm() behavior |
| Date: | 2015-06-28 23:52:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAEepm=1YAZcx2ZH1OtjV=UX7E+yz=msihdTsTzmZv59hxmtqJw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> Just by the way, I wonder if this was that bug:
>> https://illumos.org/issues/1594
>
> Oooh. Might or might not be *same* bug, but it sure looks like it could
> have the right symptom. If this is indeed inherited from old Solaris,
> I'm afraid we are totally fooling ourselves if we guess that it's no
> longer present in the wild.
Also, here is an interesting patch that went into the Apache C++
standard library. Maybe the problem was limited to amd64 system...
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-06-28 23:52:30 | Re: Solaris testers wanted for strxfrm() behavior |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-06-28 23:35:17 | Re: Solaris testers wanted for strxfrm() behavior |