Re: Proposal: BSD Authentication support

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marisa Emerson <mje(at)insec(dot)sh>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: BSD Authentication support
Date: 2016-03-11 21:38:08
Message-ID: CAEepm=0t3JDQE1qdagx4Mg8LB255f378=Xqne+yHczrvbx_xRQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 5:14 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> On 1/14/16 11:22 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:27 AM, Marisa Emerson <mje(at)insec(dot)sh> wrote:
>>> I've attached the latest version of this patch. I've fixed up an issue with
>>> the configuration scripts that I missed.
>> Looks reasonable on a quick read-through. Can anyone with access to a
>> BSD system review and test?
>
> Is anyone with access to/experience with BSD able to review and test
> this patch? Seems like it would make a great addition to 9.6.

It looks like this needs review from an OpenBSD user specifically.
FreeBSD and NetBSD use PAM instead of BSD auth.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-03-11 21:40:53 Re: Background Processes and reporting
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2016-03-11 21:33:43 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Provide much better wait information in pg_stat_activity.