Re: Failed assertion clauses != NIL

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Manuel Rigger <rigger(dot)manuel(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Failed assertion clauses != NIL
Date: 2019-11-21 12:29:39
Message-ID: CAEZATCXXF82RXJzUZATPo3OsKn137ojxNSz83LgsxhDhzVmVjg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 15:08, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Yes, adding the condition to statext_mcv_clauselist_selectivity() would
> make this go away, and it's about the simplest solution.
>

It's probably worth going a little further, and verifying that
stat_clauses references at least two attributes. We do that further up
for the original clause list, but it may not be true for the filtered
list. For example, given a WHERE clause like

c0 > 0 AND c0 < 10 AND (c0 = 0 OR c1 = 1 OR c2 = 2)

and stats on (c0, c1), stat_clauses would include the first 2 clauses,
but they only reference 1 column, so it would be preferable to not use
the multivariate stats in that case.

> Ideally, we'd be able to improve the statistics matching to recognize
> it has to match all three attributes to match the clause, which in this
> case would mean the OR clause is passed to clause_selectivity, and we do
> some magic with extended statistics there.
>
> I'll see how complex / backpatchable that would be.
>

Yes, that seems like a worthwhile thing to do, but I think it goes
beyond what would normally be back-patched. It would really be a
feature enhancement rather than a bug fix.

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ondřej Jirman 2019-11-21 12:59:13 Re: BUG #16129: Segfault in tts_virtual_materialize in logical replication worker
Previous Message Ondřej Jirman 2019-11-21 11:53:26 Re: BUG #16129: Segfault in tts_virtual_materialize in logical replication worker