From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Revert "commit_delay" change; just add comment that we don't hav |
Date: | 2012-08-15 15:41:38 |
Message-ID: | CAEYLb_WNUODiZqUW2bTm_kWOoV4GJS64e2iAyoJvT2_kjDtnEg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 15 August 2012 14:39, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> If you wanted to re-implement all the guc.c logic for supporting
> unit-ified values such that it would also work with floats, we could
> do that. It seems like way more mechanism than the problem is worth
> however.
Fair enough.
I'm not quite comfortable recommending a switch to milliseconds if
that implies a loss of sub-millisecond granularity. I know that
someone is going to point out that in some particularly benchmark,
they can get another relatively modest increase in throughput (perhaps
2%-3%) by splitting the difference between two adjoining millisecond
integer values. In that scenario, I'd be tempted to point out that
that increase is quite unlikely to carry over to real-world benefits,
because the setting is then right on the cusp of where increasing
commit_delay stops helping throughput and starts hurting it. The
improvement is likely to get lost in the noise in the context of a
real-world application, where for example the actually cost of an
fsync is more variable. I'm just not sure that that's the right
attitude.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-08-15 15:47:21 | pgsql: Document that foreign "version" and "type" values are only usefu |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-08-15 15:28:15 | pgsql: Disallow extensions from owning the schema they are assigned to. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-08-15 15:48:58 | Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-08-15 15:39:30 | Re: pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage |