Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)
Date: 2012-03-22 19:11:48
Message-ID: CAEYLb_UO4_=kFqEM=wkC9Gpcmh9VAgjKvzqZPSOMHHre1Lsh1g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22 March 2012 19:07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Will you adjust the patch for the other issues?

Sure. I'll take a look at it now.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2012-03-22 19:13:52 COPY / extend ExclusiveLock
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-03-22 19:07:55 Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)