Re: Large C files

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Large C files
Date: 2011-09-07 00:03:55
Message-ID: CAEYLb_UJkgzD6KHanspEeWmnSc_e-Kbj=sFtvQnXJdYdH-F+Bg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7 September 2011 00:13, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> * Within TUs, we unshadow a previously shadowed variable, so we link
> to a global variable rather than one local to the original/other new
> file. Unlikely to be a problem. Here's what I get when I compile
> xlog.c in the usual way with the addition of the -Wshadow flag:

I hit send too soon. Of course, this isn't going to matter in the case
I described because an extern declaration of int foo cannot appear in
the same TU as a static declaration of int foo - it won't compile. I
hastily gave that as an example of a general phenomenon that can occur
when performing this splitting process. An actually valid example of
same would be if someone refactored functions a bit as part of this
process to make things more modular, and now referenced a global
variable rather than a local one as part of that process. This is
quite possible, because namespace pollution is a big problem with
heavyweight C files - Just look at how much output that -Wshadow flag
gives when used on xlog.c.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-09-07 00:18:05 Re: Large C files
Previous Message Andy Colson 2011-09-06 23:56:37 Re: Review: prepare plans of embedded sql on function start