Re: remove dead ports?

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: remove dead ports?
Date: 2012-05-03 16:39:28
Message-ID: CAEYLb_U5BLNrunX0sDXuCkBGYxHyd=tXp54g7=SOnd3oqU25Jw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3 May 2012 17:21, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> I think I was the only user left;  I have never heard from a BSD/OS user
> in the past 5-7 years.

I'm inclined to agree with Bruce. While it's not reasonable to assume
that the lack of a BSD/OS user complaining on -general indicates that
there are none, it's also not reasonable for them to expect us to
support their operating system for 8 years after the original
proprietary vendor. Better to not support BSD/OS than to supply a port
that no one really has any confidence in. It's not as if we've ceased
support in release branches.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-05-03 16:41:40 Re: "unexpected EOF" messages
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-05-03 16:37:54 CLOG extension