Re: Replication timeout units

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replication timeout units
Date: 2011-12-20 15:53:32
Message-ID: CAEYLb_U+HkAWM9GkEo1wO+6XAk3vdw4bSEsqqWV1aH_CFH0XyQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 20 December 2011 13:38, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> from postgresql.conf.sample:
>
> #replication_timeout = 60s      # in milliseconds; 0 disables
>
> Seconds or milliseconds? I would suggest we just remove the "in
> milliseconds", and instead say "timeout for replication connections; 0
> disables".

+1 from me. That's very confusing.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marti Raudsepp 2011-12-20 16:17:57 Re: [PATCH] Fix ScalarArrayOpExpr estimation for GIN indexes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-12-20 15:34:29 Re: Replication timeout units