| From: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Kohei Kaigai <Kohei(dot)Kaigai(at)emea(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem |
| Date: | 2011-09-26 19:57:15 |
| Message-ID: | CADyhKSXbpQ93KXL3KkDYVGRzUKdr2KivVUmmYuJZwe+RfCjD8w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2011/9/26 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> writes:
>> However, the interface to reference reloptions are designed to pull
>> this information with Relation pointer, rather than lsyscache, so
>> I implemented this revision with a new rte->security_barrier member.
>
> This approach will guarantee that we can never implement an ALTER VIEW
> (or CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW) option that changes the state of the flag.
> I don't think that's a good idea.
>
Sorry, are you saying the current (in other words, rte->security_barrier
stores the state of reloption) approach is not a good idea?
Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-09-26 19:59:39 | Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-09-26 19:56:25 | Re: contrib/sepgsql regression tests are a no-go |