Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql

From: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql
Date: 2016-06-05 04:33:12
Message-ID: CADxJZo2Zy6KGdz6qFR9+sBcXY01aDzo9GoNOUDVPTzDoFGQzkQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 at 10:34 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Yeah, I think requiring PERFORM is stupid and annoying. +1 for
> letting people write a SELECT with no target.
>

Apologies for being late on the thread, but another +1 from me. I've often
been frustrated by the dissonance of PERFORM against SQL.

Cheers,
BJ

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-06-05 07:28:09 Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in joinrels.c
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2016-06-05 03:45:18 Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql