Re: proposal GSoC 2015 task: Allow access to the database via HTTP

From: Вадим Горбачев <bmsdave(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: proposal GSoC 2015 task: Allow access to the database via HTTP
Date: 2015-03-23 16:20:22
Message-ID: CADmtSid6cbrzRYwjTEKctW4vb5nzPa1wR+kmr7gdz-jMExN4Og@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

as prompted to me, already there are solutions of this task: pgrest and
OpenResty

Then it isn't clear why this task is in TODO the sheet
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo...
Prompt what exactly is understood as "Allow access to the database via
HTTP"?
From what party to approach this task?
Whether it still also is actual?

Best Regards,
Vadim Gorbachov

2015-03-23 1:28 GMT+03:00 Вадим Горбачев <bmsdave(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> Hi Team.
>
> I would like to solve a problem of "Allow access to the database via
> HTTP".
>
> But before drawing up the demand in GSOC I wanted to consult here.
> Therefore I will be grateful to comments from attendees here!
>
> 1. I think, will better use access to DB through the stand-alone program
> which not necessarily has to be on the same server. At least because it
> will give certain freedom in cluster systems.
>
> 2. Whether it is obligatory to use a programming language C for this
> purpose? After all as the stand-alone program ( frontend ) it has to be not
> necessarily written in the same programming language as the server (
> backend ). I would prefer to use the python language for writing as I
> consider that this language is more clear to system administrators + to
> bring much more simply editings in a code.
>
> 3. What you will advise what to pass a selection stage in GSOC 2015 from
> postgresql?)
>
> PS: my English is poor. I ask you to forgive me for it.
>
> Best Regards,
> Vadim Gorbachov
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2015-03-23 16:24:21 Re: PATCH: pgbench - merging transaction logs
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2015-03-23 16:11:35 Re: pg_dump quietly ignore missing tables - is it bug?