| From: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Torsten Zuehlsdorff <mailinglists(at)toco-domains(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer) |
| Date: | 2016-03-04 20:17:31 |
| Message-ID: | CADkLM=fy6hpCxt1VVuXESzQCpibb75mbGqVmt3asrcwRFah+Gg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
>
> I feel rather uneasy about simply removing the 'infinity' checks. Is there
> a way to differentiate those two cases, i.e. when the generate_series is
> called in target list and in the FROM part? If yes, we could do the check
> only in the FROM part, which is the case that does not work (and consumes
> arbitrary amounts of memory).
>
>
It would be simple enough to remove the infinity test on the "stop" and
leave it on the "start". Or yank both. Just waiting for others to agree
which checks should remain.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-04 20:45:40 | Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW |
| Previous Message | Vitaly Burovoy | 2016-03-04 19:56:47 | Re: [PATCH] Supporting +-Infinity values by to_timestamp(float8) |