>
> > So presently partitions that are unbounded on the lower end aren't
> > possible, but that's a creation syntax issue, not an infrastructure
> issue.
> > Correct?
>
> In case it wasn't apparent, you can create those:
>
> FOR VALUES END (upper-bound) [INCLUSIVE]
>
> which is equivalent to:
>
> FOR VALUES '(, upper-bound)' or FOR VALUES '(, upper-bound]'
>
>
Thanks for clarifying. My BNF-fu is weak.
>
>