Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <notifications(at)github(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)
Date: 2016-01-07 16:47:42
Message-ID: CADK3HHLTQYr5GGuKdUaFTdwkGSf9iHp3WRaM-anBeuFFwdT3NQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On 7 January 2016 at 11:46, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:

> On Thursday 07 of January 2016 11:13:54 Dave Cramer wrote:
> > Other java projects to not attempt to support 3 versions of an API with
> > one piece of code.
>
> Is that really that rare? Or those do split the code into many files?
> That sounds weird.
>
>
Not sure, but Java broke their own rules by introducing new types into the
interfaces so we are doing the best we can

Dave Cramer

davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com

> Pavel
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vladimir Sitnikov 2016-01-07 16:54:04 Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)
Previous Message Pavel Raiskup 2016-01-07 16:46:16 Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)