From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <notifications(at)github(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435) |
Date: | 2016-01-07 16:47:42 |
Message-ID: | CADK3HHLTQYr5GGuKdUaFTdwkGSf9iHp3WRaM-anBeuFFwdT3NQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On 7 January 2016 at 11:46, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thursday 07 of January 2016 11:13:54 Dave Cramer wrote:
> > Other java projects to not attempt to support 3 versions of an API with
> > one piece of code.
>
> Is that really that rare? Or those do split the code into many files?
> That sounds weird.
>
>
Not sure, but Java broke their own rules by introducing new types into the
interfaces so we are doing the best we can
Dave Cramer
davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com
> Pavel
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2016-01-07 16:54:04 | Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435) |
Previous Message | Pavel Raiskup | 2016-01-07 16:46:16 | Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435) |