| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Vitalii Tymchyshyn <vit(at)tym(dot)im>, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com>, Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com>, Stephen Nelson <stephen(at)eccostudio(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Step towards being able to build on Linux (Pull request #435) |
| Date: | 2016-01-21 22:40:56 |
| Message-ID: | CADK3HHKw4dgCsD1UUJw=YN8w07rTN8MN8NF=L6T3JNcQF_s0=g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Yes, Alvaro found one that should work
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OSGiGuidelines, although I
don't see a ubuntu one
Dave Cramer
davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com
On 21 January 2016 at 17:04, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> >So it seems like one solution to osgi is just to copy the sources into
> the project. These are all interfaces, and a minimal number of files, I
> think around 4
>
> What's the problem with packaging OSGi interfaces as usual rpms (or
> whatever is used for packaging)?
> As for me, "copy&pasting <<minimal number of files, I think around
> 4>>" does not solve legal issues if there are any.
> On top of that, exposing OSGi interfaces as part of pgjdbc.jar would
> probably void OSGi compliance. The jar would just not load due to
> invalid contents.
>
> Vladimir
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Álvaro Hernández Tortosa | 2016-01-22 00:26:36 | Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435) |
| Previous Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2016-01-21 22:04:37 | Re: Step towards being able to build on Linux (Pull request #435) |