From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jonas Sundman <jonas(dot)sundman(at)thl(dot)fi> |
Cc: | "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: bug on to do list reproducable at version 9.0-801 |
Date: | 2012-02-09 11:34:05 |
Message-ID: | CADK3HHJ9FFTRmKdzMXkcyAFW_4W0iv7cWzATxdeE4=B6QfXnmw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
I should have some time to look at this.
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Jonas Sundman <jonas(dot)sundman(at)thl(dot)fi> wrote:
> On 2012-02-08 02:31, Kasia Tuszynska wrote:
>>
>> Hello jdbc mailing list,
>>
>> We are using: version 9.0-801
>>
>> I found that the inconsistent behavior we were expariancing with
>> getTablePrivileges, has been logged as a bug and listed on :
>> http://jdbc.postgresql.org/todo.html
>>
>> *[bugs]* ACLs have changed format since the parsing code was written. The
>> code
>>
>> only supports 7.3 style ACLs. DatabaseMetaData methods like
>> getTablePrivileges
>> do not work correctly against later servers
>>
>> I was wondering if there is a timeframe by which this issue would be
>> resolved.
>>
>
> Indeed I wrote a patch to the acl parsing which I submitted some time ago
> <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2011-08/msg00071.php>.
>
> Now that the git move has been successfully done, is there a chance that
> someone could review the patch at this point?
>
> A quick check against 9.1 worked fine, also.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jonas Sundman
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steven Schlansker | 2012-02-10 00:01:25 | Patch to fix bug #6293 - regression in driver performance with regards to ResultSetMetaData-heavy workloads |
Previous Message | Jonas Sundman | 2012-02-09 07:17:56 | Re: bug on to do list reproducable at version 9.0-801 |