Re: bug on to do list reproducable at version 9.0-801

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Jonas Sundman <jonas(dot)sundman(at)thl(dot)fi>
Cc: "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug on to do list reproducable at version 9.0-801
Date: 2012-02-09 11:34:05
Message-ID: CADK3HHJ9FFTRmKdzMXkcyAFW_4W0iv7cWzATxdeE4=B6QfXnmw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

I should have some time to look at this.

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Jonas Sundman <jonas(dot)sundman(at)thl(dot)fi> wrote:
> On 2012-02-08 02:31, Kasia Tuszynska wrote:
>>
>> Hello jdbc mailing list,
>>
>> We are using: version 9.0-801
>>
>> I found that the inconsistent behavior we were expariancing with
>> getTablePrivileges, has been logged as a bug and listed on :
>> http://jdbc.postgresql.org/todo.html
>>
>> *[bugs]* ACLs have changed format since the parsing code was written. The
>> code
>>
>> only supports 7.3 style ACLs. DatabaseMetaData methods like
>> getTablePrivileges
>> do not work correctly against later servers
>>
>> I was wondering if there is a timeframe by which this issue would be
>> resolved.
>>
>
> Indeed I wrote a patch to the acl parsing which I submitted some time ago
> <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2011-08/msg00071.php>.
>
> Now that the git move has been successfully done, is there a chance that
> someone could review the patch at this point?
>
> A quick check against 9.1 worked fine, also.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jonas Sundman
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steven Schlansker 2012-02-10 00:01:25 Patch to fix bug #6293 - regression in driver performance with regards to ResultSetMetaData-heavy workloads
Previous Message Jonas Sundman 2012-02-09 07:17:56 Re: bug on to do list reproducable at version 9.0-801