| From: | Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility) |
| Date: | 2013-02-08 18:07:05 |
| Message-ID: | CADAkt-j5uE35F=Gr0eQ-K_z1iHkVwNZX_biH49fZu4nSr-2Otg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> No maybe. But I think that all the client commands should follow the
> same rule. Otherwise a user would get confused when specifying
> options.
I would consider the rest of the apps using it as a consensus. I will
make sure it aligns in behavior.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-02-08 18:09:07 | Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to drop privileges granted by non-owners (was Re: [GENERAL] Bug, Feature, or what else?) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-02-08 18:03:48 | Re: function for setting/getting same timestamp during whole transaction |