Re: Localhost vs. Unix Domain Sockets?

From: Ken Tanzer <ken(dot)tanzer(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Localhost vs. Unix Domain Sockets?
Date: 2014-08-19 01:45:47
Message-ID: CAD3a31WsC9+Cdr2YMVFk1Gwebh40e2O_4WqiGVBNLkf0tEQVjg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks. I'm not really worried about this particular vulnerability, just
wondering about the more general idea that having db user name = os user
could reduce your security, even if only slightly. Is it just as
conceivable that a vulnerability could come along that was more exploitable
only if the two names were _different_?

To put it another way, keeping the two sets of names distinct is
incrementally more complex to manage. Which might be worth it if there
really is any gain. Is this a "best practice," or is it really a
manifestation of its closely-related cousin, the "silly practice?" :)

Cheers,
Ken

--
AGENCY Software
A Free Software data system
By and for non-profits
*http://agency-software.org/ <http://agency-software.org/>*
*https://agency-software.org/demo/client
<https://agency-software.org/demo/client>*
ken(dot)tanzer(at)agency-software(dot)org
(253) 245-3801

Subscribe to the mailing list
<agency-general-request(at)lists(dot)sourceforge(dot)net?body=subscribe> to
learn more about AGENCY or
follow the discussion.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2014-08-19 01:51:46 Re: Localhost vs. Unix Domain Sockets?
Previous Message Jov 2014-08-19 01:21:34 Re: New wrapper library: QUINCE